Here's what looks to be an interesting study from Forester, via the blog Lifehacker. While the study costs money, Lifehacker reports that it found RSS use (blogs and such) has slowly risen to around 11 percent. That means most folks are still going to individual Web sites or getting information in other ways.
Now, RSS is still relatively new and things like that take time to catch on. But the troubling part (for RSS proponents) is that of the large portion of people not using it, an overwhelming majority -- something like four-fifths -- aren't even interested in learning about it.
Have we finally reached a point where the tired expression "TMI" ceases to refer to gross or unsavory information but instead means, quite literally "too much information"? As a self-described RSS junkie, I can definitely see where most people would quite happily swear off the vast amounts of information that cross my computer screen each day.
Now, RSS is still relatively new and things like that take time to catch on. But the troubling part (for RSS proponents) is that of the large portion of people not using it, an overwhelming majority -- something like four-fifths -- aren't even interested in learning about it.
Have we finally reached a point where the tired expression "TMI" ceases to refer to gross or unsavory information but instead means, quite literally "too much information"? As a self-described RSS junkie, I can definitely see where most people would quite happily swear off the vast amounts of information that cross my computer screen each day.
Powered by ScribeFire.
No comments:
Post a Comment