Friday, April 9, 2010
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT!
As of Friday, April 8, 2010, this blog has moved. Please visit http://blogs.twinsburglibrary.org
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Amazon: Kindle will "save" reading
Here's an interesting article posted at PC World. Amazon's Kindle has been a runaway success by nearly any measure. Now, there's an update -- thinner and with more storage -- slated to release later this month. In a press conference, Amazon claimed the Kindle will "save" reading of long-form text. Of course, recent stories (and Twinsburg's circulation statistics) indicate that reading, at least where libraries are concerned, is still pretty healthy. More uncertain is the public's willingness to pay $350 for a Kindle, plus charges for non-transferrable books to read on it. The Kindle seems great and all, but I'm skeptical that, even if reading needs to be "saved," Amazon will do the job with this.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
New Kindle
It hasn't been in headlines too much lately, but Amazon's Kindle has been doing really well in sales. Looks like the device may get an update shortly. Rumor is the announcement will be made at a NY library, which is kind of weird considering the device's library-unfriendly user agreement and proprietary file format. Still, cool is cool and people will want this.
Powered by ScribeFire.
New Kindle
It hasn't been in headlines too much lately, but Amazon's Kindle has been doing really well in sales. Looks like the device may get an update shortly. Rumor is the announcement will be made at a NY library, which is kind of weird considering the device's library-unfriendly user agreement and proprietary file format. Still, cool is cool and people will want this.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
FCC and DRM; two great acronyms that go great together
Here's a post on the gaming blog Blue's News about digital rights management. It seems the FCC is seeking consumer input about the use of technologies that impede the use of the materials they're bundled with. I have a few examples I may send in. It's surprisingly easy to get hit with the DRM stick. One example is downloadable books. While the actual audio books may be fine, the DRM often causes problems for people trying to use those books here at the library. It really is a consumer nightmare.
Is Blu-Ray passe?
Here's a NY Times story via the blog HardOCP. It takes a look at Blu-Ray, which was expected to bloom as the HD format bowed out of the high-def format war last year. The problem is, people don't seem to be snatching up Blu-Ray in the droves Sony imagined. While the price of players has finally become reasonable, there seems to be a real sense that downloadable high def movies are just around the corner. In other words, the new disc-based media may have simply come too late. Meanwhile, there are only just over a thousand titles available on Blu-Ray. Already, one Web-based service offers 1,400 titles as high-def downloads. Could DVDs outlive Blu-Ray simply by being "good enough"?
is open source viable?
Is open source just a fad?
According to the tech blog HardOCP, some projects aren't as healthy as their popularity indicates. Here's the post. Apparently OpenOffice only has 24 active developers working on it. When you consider how many apps are included in that package and how frequently it's updated, that's not many at all. In some ways this should probably be expected: It's hard to get people to work on something that doesn't have a traditional revenue stream. While OpenOffice is backed by Sun, many open source projects don't enjoy regular funding or are maintained by volunteers. The products are solid enough to make the commercial equivalents work for their money. But in the long run, might that be a bad thing? If open source squeezes the market, especially where small developers are concerned, but then proves unviable, could it lead to stagnation?
According to the tech blog HardOCP, some projects aren't as healthy as their popularity indicates. Here's the post. Apparently OpenOffice only has 24 active developers working on it. When you consider how many apps are included in that package and how frequently it's updated, that's not many at all. In some ways this should probably be expected: It's hard to get people to work on something that doesn't have a traditional revenue stream. While OpenOffice is backed by Sun, many open source projects don't enjoy regular funding or are maintained by volunteers. The products are solid enough to make the commercial equivalents work for their money. But in the long run, might that be a bad thing? If open source squeezes the market, especially where small developers are concerned, but then proves unviable, could it lead to stagnation?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)